Share It

Saturday, January 21, 2012

डाकघर की लापरवाही से युवाओं में आक्रोश


डाकघर की लापरवाही से युवाओं में आक्रोश

जसराना। डाकघर की लापरवाही से दर्जनों युवाओं का भविष्य अंधकारमय हो गया। टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थियों द्वारा शिकोहाबाद, फीरोजाबाद एवं आगरा से स्पीड पोस्ट द्वारा भेजे फार्म वापिस आने सेे युवाओं में आक्रोश है। डाकघर के खिलाफ युवा अदालत जाने का मन बना रहे हैं। जसराना में स्पीड पोस्ट की सुविधा न होने के कारण अभ्यर्थियों को अन्य शहरों की दौड़ लगानी पड़ती है। सुनील कुमार यादव, नीलम यादव, योगेश कुमार यादव, कृष्णकांत सिंह, हुकुम सिंह यादव, संदीप सिंह चौहान, विवेक कुमार, हरकेश, ललित कुमार, अनिल कुमार, रजनी यादव, शैलेष, मनीष, चंद्रेश कुमार, अनिल कुमार, योगेंद्र कुमार, सुनील कुमार, रघुराज सिंह, सत्यपाल सिंह आदि ने कहा कि उन्होंने शिकोहाबाद, फीरोजाबाद एवं आगरा के डाकघरों से टीईटी के आवेदन फार्म डायटों पर 3 जनवरी से छह जवनरी के मध्य भेजे थे लेकिन उनके आवेदन फार्म वापस लौट आए हैं। फार्म वापस आने से टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थियों में खलबली मच गई है। रोज फार्माें के वापस आने का क्रम जारी है।

Thursday, January 19, 2012

इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट : टी ई टी मार्क्स / मेरिट से सेलेक्सन के विरोध की याचिका ख़ारिज

इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट : टी ई टी मार्क्स / मेरिट से सेलेक्सन के विरोध की याचिका ख़ारिज

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 75474 of 2011

Petitioner :- Dr. Prashant Kumar Dubey
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Alok Mishra
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1.Learned counsel for the petitioner tried to submit that Rule 14 (1) and (2) of U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 as amended by notification dated 9th November, 2011 making amendment in U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 i.e. 12th Amendment is illegal, inasmuch as, it makes the marks obtained in Teacher Eligibility Test (hereinafter referred to as "T.E.T.") as the basis for including a person in the list to be prepared by the appointing authority after advertisement issued for appointment which is to be submitted to the Selection Committee though T.E.T. is only eligibility qualification and cannot be a basis for making selection.


2.The submission is thoroughly misconceived. The aforesaid amendment of the Rule by no stretch of imagination, can be construed as contrary to the guidelines issued by National Council for Teacher Education (hereinafter referred to as "NCTE") inasmuch as, NCTE provides T.E.T. qualification as a necessary qualification for appointment of Primary Teachers but simultaneously provides that it shall not guarantee appointment to any person merely on account of possession of such qualification. The Rules do not go contrary thereto but only provide that before a candidates is to be considered by Selection Committee, list of candidates, who have applied for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher, shall be prepared and in that preparation of list, T.E.T. marks shall be the criteria.It is like a guideline for ascertaining zone of -2 - consideration and field of eligibility but by itself does not provide any guarantee for appointment. The Rules thus cannot be said to be contrary to NCTE guidelines.
3. No interference therefore called for.
4. Dismissed.
Order Date :- 2.1.2012

Allahabad Highcourt Suggests TET Exam is a good process for Selections/UPTET / BTC : Good News for TET Qualified Candidates

UPTET / BTC : Good News for TET Qualified Candidates


Allahabad Highcourt Suggests TET Exam is a good process for Selections -
We are pleased to note that the system of Teachers' Eligibility Test (TET) examination has been introduced as that will also check dishonest, unqualified candidates with forged degrees securing easy entry into teachers education courses and thereby securing teaching jobs.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18498 of 2011
Petitioner :- Sachin Rana And Anr.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Ram Raj Pandey
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate
Connected with
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. 18572 of 2011
Petitioner: Nirbhay Singh
Respondent: State of UP and others
Petitioner Counsel : Rajeev Chaddha
Respondent Counsel: Govt Advocate

Hon'ble Amar Saran,J.
Hon'ble Kalimullah Khan,J.
Heard Shri D.R. Chaudhary, learned Government Advocate assisted by Shri Vimlendu Tripathi, learned Additional Government Advocate.
This order will apply to all the connected writ petitions. However, the present Writ petition No. 18498/2011 (District Baghpat) preferred by Sachin Rana and others and Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 18572 of 2011, (District Ghaziabad) preferred by Nirbhay Singh shall be treated as the leading petitions.
This case relates to the scam of obtaining fake mark sheets from the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal and the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi for the purpose of getting admission in B.T.C. courses for securing government jobs of primary school teachers.
Pursuant to our earlier order dated 11.10.2011, affidavits of compliance dated 14.11.2011 have been filed on behalf of the Director General of Police , Headquarters, UP, Lucknow and on behalf of SHO Baraut, district Baghpat and affidavit dated 15.11.2011 filed on behalf of the State of UP and SHO, PS Hapur Nagar, district Ghaziabad in the two leading petitions.
Two investigating officers from the two districts, Baghpat (P.S. Baraut) and Ghazaibad (P.S. Hapur Nagar) are present. The Director, Basic Education, U.P. is also present in Court pursuant to the earlier order.
The affidavit of the Director General of Police, UP shows that a letter dated 2.11.2011 has been issued by the DGP directing the Inspector General of Police, Meerut Region, Meerut to ensure that strict and fair investigation be carried out in pursuance of the order of this Court dated 11.10.2011. Consequently, letters have been issued by the Inspector General of Police, Meerut Region, Meerut dated 2/3.11.2011 to the SP, Baghpat and the SP, Panchsheel Nagar for strict and fair investigation in the matter. The Director General, Public Grievance has also written a letter to the SSP, Ghaziabad to the same effect.
The affidavit of the Investigating officer, PS Baraut (Baghpat) shows that as per the list supplied by the Principal, DIET, forged certificates/ mark sheets of 18 candidates whose certificates were purportedly issued by the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal and 59 candidates, whose certificates were purportedly issued by the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi, i.e a total of 77 mark sheets have been found to be forged. The affidavit of SI of PS Hapur Nagar, district Ghaziabad shows that 49 cases have been registered at police station Hapur Nagar, district Ghaziabad, now district Panchsheel Nagar. Out of these 49 cases, 37 cases relate to forged and fabricated mark sheets issued by the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal, whereas 12 cases pertain to forged and fabricated mark sheets issued by the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi. This affidavit further mentions that the CBCID is investigating the case against the employees of Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi, namely Mihir Mishra, posted as Satyapan Sahayak and Vijay Shankar Shukla, Assistant Sub-Registrar (Examination) at case crime No. 69 of 2011, under sections 467, 468 and 471 IPC, PS Chetganj, district Varanasi for issuing fabricated and fake mark sheets. Investigation has been completed or is nearing completion in most of the cases and the charge sheets are ready.
We think that the magnitude of this problem as seen in the 49 cases relating to district Ghaziabad and 77 cases relating to district Baghpat (i.e. a total of 126 cases) suggests that the problem of getting admissions to BTC courses on the basis of forged and fabricated mark sheets has assumed the nature of a scam.
It has begun to appear to this Court that now it is becoming a rarity for candidates try to get admissions to BTC courses in a bona fide manner on the basis of genuine mark sheets, and that trying to get admission to BTC courses on the basis of forged and fabricated mark sheets seems to be looked upon as a very normal and legitimate activity. For this purpose the candidates actively collude with some employees of the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal and Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi.
The modus operandi of the dishonest officials at the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal appears to be that they issue forged mark sheets by substituting the names of applicants who may be ingratiating or bribing them, which relate to roll numbers of other persons, who have actually written the examinations, and have obtained the marks shown. Thereafter the dishonest officials sitting in the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal issue certificates certifying that the candidate concerned has actually written the examination and the certificate relates to him. This fact is usually verified by the corrupt officials at the desk at the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopa when the enquiry is initially made from them, and consequently the dishonest candidates have even succeeded in obtaining admission to the BTC course. Only when a verification was made from the Principals of the concerned colleges whether the named candidates had indeed written the examinations, it was found that the roll numbers on the mark sheets related to other persons and not the petitioners and the other accused at all.
The result is that deserving candidates, who may have qualified on merit loose out their right to admission to BTC courses and consequent employment opportunities to these fraudsters who are engaged in such grave frauds. The standard of teaching in primary education has accordingly declined. There is also great teacher absenteeism in primary schools because there is no honest commitment to their jobs of such teachers who obtain admission to BTC courses and thereafter secure teaching jobs in primary schools on the strength of
forged degrees and certificates and consequent failure of teaching at the primary level which is the foundation for a child's education, with grave loss to the child, the society and the nation.
This Court will be failing in its duty if it does not recommend coming down with a heavy hand and taking strict action against the culprits engaged in manufacturing or using forged mark sheets for obtaining admissions to BTC courses.
We also anticipate that some middlemen may be involved, who do not appear to have been identified as yet probably because many orders staying arrests were obtained by candidates seeking admission to BTC courses, on the basis of forged and fabricated mark sheets, in these and connected writ petitions, hence the said candidates could not be interrogated to find out the names of the middlemen involved in promoting these malpractices. As the investigations of the cases against most of the writ petitioners appear to have been completed or are nearing completion, and the interrogation of the accused appears to be imperative for identifying these middle men and other accused who may be conspirators or actors of this larger conspiracy, the orders staying arrests in all the connections petitions are forthwith vacated.
As indicated above the CBCID is also investigating the matter relating to the officials of the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi, who are involved in this crime, we direct that the investigation in all these connected petitions whether they relate to Ghaziabad, Baghpat, Varanasi or any other district to be transferred to the same CB CID investigating agency so that the scam (and the various offenders involved therein) may be unearthed in its totality. Coercive measures may also be taken against the concerned candidates and officials of the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal, so that they may be interrogated and the middlemen involved in facilitating this offence may be identified.
We also direct that the investigation may be expeditiously concluded by the CB CID against all the accused persons preferably in a period of 3 months.
Here we would like to record our appreciation of the learned Government Advocate Sri D.R. Chaudhary and the AGA, Sri Vimalendu Tripathi, and for their positive suggestions in this non-adversarial litigation and support to the Court in its pious mission of tackling this grave menace of securing admissions to BTC courses by persons relying on forged mark sheets. He was readily agreeable and raised no objection to the investigation being conducted in its totality by the CB CID as directed by the Court.
Looking to the wide language of Article 226 of the Constitution we think that as substantial parts of the cause of action has arisen in the State of UP, where the candidates are applying for admission to the BTC course, there should be no impediment for this Court directing the CBCID to investigate the offences committed by the concerned officials of the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and also by the concerned officials of the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal, M.P.
But we make it clear that if we are not satisfied with the investigation by the CB CID, or the CB CID faces some impediment in investigating the matter against the accused and middle men (if any) connected with the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal Bhopal who may also be involved in the crime., the Court may have no option but to transfer the entire investigation to the CBI on some future date.
In any case we are of the opinion that there is no impediment on the DGP or IG (Public Grievances), U.P. communicating with their counterparts in the State of M.P. for carrying out a joint investigation in this case and accordingly we issue a mandamus to the said authorities to comply with this direction. We also direct the Secretaries of Basic, Secondary or Higher Education, U.P., whatever may be applicable, to also communicate with their counterparts in M.P. for ensuring that this problem is jointly investigated and measures for checking the problem are put in place both in M.P and U.P.
We also think it advisable and accordingly direct the Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal and other examining/ certificate awarding bodies which conduct examinations or issue certificates relating to High School, Intermediate, Graduation and Post Graduation degrees to develop appropriate software for uploading information of the candidates who have actually written the examinations, their parentage and address, date of birth, the year of the examination, the centre from where the examination was written, division and marks obtained, and other relevant details on the website, so that imposters cannot claim to have acquired the said marks by falsely substituting themselves in place of the genuine students in the mark sheets relating to bona fide candidates in collusion with some dishonest examining/ certificate issuing body employees. If possible scanned or digital photographs of the candidates should also be placed on the website. We may mention that by this computerization process, it would be much easier to verify whether any wrong candidate has been able to secure admission to BTC courses or to have obtained job in the said sector on the basis of non-existent or forged mark sheet, which relates to another person
.
We are pleased to note that the system of Teachers' Eligibility Test (TET) examination has been introduced as that will also check dishonest, unqualified candidates with forged degrees securing easy entry into teachers education courses and thereby securing teaching jobs.


Similar information regarding all the teaching and non-teaching employees of the Primary, Secondary and Higher Education sector along with photographs, if possible, containing the aforesaid data may also be uploaded on the website, so that unqualified persons working on these teaching jobs on the basis of forged degrees may be identified and removed from their jobs and criminally prosecuted.
Information regarding the different courses offered by the different institutions and their equivalence with other degrees should also be mentioned on the net.
The concerned secretaries and police heads must also take steps for checking other frauds such as the reported practice of transferred employees drawing salaries at the existing place whilst also drawing salaries at the transferred place of work, or another fraudulent person receiving the double salary at the new place of work in the name of the employee on the rolls, by placing information regarding the transfer of the employee on the net and taking other relevant measures and they shall also apprise the Court regarding these other frauds and scams in the education sector on the next date, so that appropriate directions may be issued.
We would like the concerned Education Secretary to take the aforesaid suggestions into consideration for issuing appropriate orders and apprise this Court by the next listing about the steps taken for carrying out the recommendations made hereinabove.
We would like to get a complete report from the investigating agency regarding the progress of investigation and whether the accused persons have been arrested and whether any additional accused persons, such as the middlemen, who have brought about a link between the candidates and the educational bodies, such as Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi and the Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal or other bodies and the progress in submission of the charge sheets.
We would like the investigating officer of CB CID entrusted with the investigation as well as his supervisory superior officer of CBCID and also a senior person in the concerned department of Education to appear in this Court for reporting compliance and for informing this Court regarding the progress of investigation and also with regard to the steps taken for placing data on the web site, for improving inter-state co-ordination and carrying out other directions given in the present and earlier orders.
List this case on 16.1.2012 for submission of compliance/ progress reports as directed hereinabove. Orders staying arrests in these petitions as well as in all connected petitions are hereby vacated. On the next date the registry is directed to list these petitions as Criminal PILs.
Order Date :- 15.11.2011

शिक्षक चयन मेँ दस हजार फर्जी आवेदन

शिक्षक चयन मेँ दस हजार फर्जी आवेदन

टीईटी के सहारे सहायक अध्यापक चयन के लिए प्रदेश भर मेँ 10170 आवेदनोँ के साथ फर्जी अंकपत्र लगे हैँ।ज्यादातर ने टीईटी के फर्जी अंकपत्र लगाये हैँ। 2500 से ज्यादा अभ्यर्थियोँ के हाईस्कूल व इंटर की अंकपत्र भी फर्जी होने की आशंका जतायी जा रही है। शिक्षा विभाग के उपनिदेशक जयपाल गर्ग ने बताया कि जाँच के बाद पूरी रिपोर्ट शासन को सौँप दी जाएगी। प्रदेश भर में कूल सवा करोड़ आवेदन पत्र जमा हुए हैँ।

Amar Ujala (19.01.2012)

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

DECESION OF 11.01.2012

DECESION OF 11.01.2012



This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Deputy Registrar(Copying).


HIGH COURT OF
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Court No.
- 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76039 of 2011

Petitioner :- Yadav Kapildev Lal Bahadur
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Alok Kumar Yadav,Rajesh Yadav
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.S. Kushwaha

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.
1. Pursuant to this Court's order dated 4.1.2012, Sri Anil Sant, Secretary, Basic Education and Sri Indrapal Sharma, Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board are present. An affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no. 1 purported to be in compliance of this Courts' order dated 4.1.2012. Sri K.S. Kushwaha, learned Standing Counsel started his argument by submitting that respondent no. 1 and 2 both were required to justify only how the advertisement was issued on behalf of all District Basic Education Officers and whether it is so permissible under the Rules. He contended that under Rule 13 of U.P. Basic Education Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as "Act, 1972") such power is possessed by State Government. He also stated that in purported exercise of power under the aforesaid provision, a Government Order dated 27.9.2011 was issued after a decision was taken to this effect by the Cabinet. A copy of the said Government Order is Annexure 3 to the affidavit of respondent no. 1, Sri Anil Sant, Secretary, Basic Education. He read the aforesaid Government Order, but when enquired as to where this Government Order authorizes the Board of Education to publish an advertisement calling applications for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher is discard of Rule 14 (1) since though under Rule 14 (1) of Rules, 1981 such power is conferred upon Appointing Authority i.e. District Basic Education Officer, and none else, he firstly said that he shall go through entire Order but when asked whether entire order anywhere authorizes the Board to make such advertisement on behalf of the Appointing Authority, he could not give any reply and said that he would have to obtain further instructions and shall file counter affidavit for which time should be granted. This very question was put to Sri Sant, Secretary himself, and he also stated that on behalf of all District Basic Education Officer, the advertisement was published by Board but ultimately the appointments shall be made by Appointing Authority and therefore in his understanding there is no error in the matter. However, he also could not show whether the Board specifically was authorized by Government in exercise of power allegedly under Section 13 of Act, 1972, to exercise power of Appointing Authority under Section 14 (1) of Rules, 1981 for the purpose of advertisement for making selection and appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher.
2. Learned Chief Standing Counsel, however, fairly stated that this matter requires serious consideration and for that purpose he may be allowed some time to file counter affidavit.
3. Ex facie after hearing submissions of learned counsel for parties as also Secretary, Basic Education who has appeared in person, I find that the real issue which is to be replied by respondents is, whether for making selection and appointment on the post of Assistant Teachers in primary schools governed by Rules, 1981, can an advertisement be made by an authority other than the Appointing Authority, i.e. District Basic Education Officer. When law require something to be done in a particular manner, any other mode and manner is prohibited, illegal and void-ab-initio and anything has to be done in the manner prescribed in statute otherwise it is illegal and void ab-initio. At this stage, I do not propose to make any further observation in the matter except that after having gone through the entire Government Order dated 27.9.2011 I find that it lays down procedure for making selection for providing six months training but for the purpose of selection and appointment which is governed by Rules, 1981, the said Government Order does not make ppointment which is govenred ths training but for the purpsoe r dated 27.9.2011 I find that it lays down proceduany deviation therein and on the contrary at different places stress upon its strict compliance. Since learned counsel appearing for respondents have sought time, I defer the hearing in the matter further.
4. As prayed by learned Chief Standing Counsel, list/put up this matter on 1.2.2012 to enable him to file a detailed counter affidavit. He also submitted that there are some other matters involving the same question, therefore, they may be connected with this matter and may be heard together. Let all similar matter be connected.
5. Interim order, already granted, shall continue till the next date of listing.
6. Personal appearance of respondents 1 and 2 is exempted unless required otherwise.
Dt. 11.1.2012

जेडी कार्यालयों को भेजे गए टीईटी सर्टिफिकेट

जेडी कार्यालयों को भेजे गए टीईटी सर्टिफिकेट

वरिष्ठ संवाददाता, इलाहाबाद : माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद द्वारा 13 नवंबर को ली गई अध्यापक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) में सफल अभ्यर्थियों को सर्टिफिकेट भेजने का काम शुरू कर दिया गया है। सर्टिफिकेट एक-दो दिन में प्रदेश के सभी मंडलों के संयुक्त शिक्षा निदेशक दफ्तर में पहुंच जाएंगे। सर्टिफिकेट का वितरण संयुक्त शिक्षा निदेशक कार्यालय से ही होगा।
माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद द्वारा शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा का परिणाम 25 नवंबर को घोषित किया गया था। परिणाम घोषित किए जाने के कुछ दिन बाद बोर्ड ने उत्तर माला जारी की। उत्तर माला जारी होने के बाद अभ्यर्थियों ने कई प्रश्नों पर आपत्ति कर दी। बोर्ड ने कुछ प्रश्नों पर आपत्तियां भी ठीक कर दीं, लेकिन अभ्यर्थी इससे संतुष्ट नहीं हुए और हाईकोर्ट चले गए। हाईकोर्ट ने 16 दिसंबर को दिए अपने आदेश में अभ्यर्थियों की सभी आपत्तियों का निस्तारण करने को कहा। इस बीच बोर्ड ने प्राथमिक स्तर के अभ्यर्थियों के प्रमाण पत्रों को छपने के लिए भेज दिया। प्राथमिक स्तर के करीब तीन लाख टीईटी सर्टिफिकेट छप भी गए। हाईकोर्ट के आदेश के बाद बोर्ड ने एक बार फिर पूरे परिणाम को संशोधित कर दिया। इसमें प्राथमिक स्तर के अभ्यर्थियों को एक से छह उच्च प्राथमिक स्तर के अभ्यर्थियों को एक से 10 अंकों का फायदा हुआ। इससे बोर्ड द्वारा छपवाए गए प्राथमिक स्तर के सर्टिफिकेट बेकार हो गए। बोर्ड ने सभी आपत्तियों का निस्तारण करने के बाद सर्टिफिकेट का संशोधित परीक्षा परिणाम के आधार पर फिर छपवाया है। अब इन्हें सभी मंडलीय संयुक्त शिक्षा निदेशक कार्यालयों में भेजा जा रहा है। माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद की सचिव प्रभा त्रिपाठी ने बताया कि सर्टिफिकेट छपकर गए हैं। सभी मंडलीय संयुक्त शिक्षा निदेशकों को भेजे जा रहे हैं। एक-दो दिन में सभी जेडी कार्यालयों पर पहुंच जाएंगे। अभ्यर्थी

http://in.jagran.yahoo.com/news/local/uttarpradesh/4_1_8782322.html
संबंधित जेडी कार्यालयों से अपने सर्टिफिकेट ले सकते हैं।

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

टूटा ‘मास्साब’ बनने का सपना

टूटामास्साबबनने का सपना


छाता। डाक विभाग की लापरवाही से हजारों शिक्षकों का भविष्य चौपट हो रहा है। वे विभाग के खिलाफ कोर्ट की शरण में जाने की तैयारी में हैं उन्हाेंने माध्यमिक शिक्षा बोर्ड से टीईटी के आवेदन की अंतिम तिथि बढ़ाये जाने की मांग की है। डाक विभाग की लापरवाही से हजारों अभ्यर्थियों का शिक्षक बनने का सपना चकनाचूर कर दिया है। अध्यापक पात्रता परीक्षा के भेजे गए आवेदन पत्र रोजाना सैकड़ों लोगों के वापस रहे हैं। अभ्यर्थियों का आरोप है कि डाक विभाग वैसे तो पूरे देश में स्पीड पोस्ट को पहुंचाने का चौबीस घंटे का दावा करती है। लेकिन जिन अभ्यर्थियों ने हब सेंटर आगरा से ही जाकर पांच और छह जनवरी को आवेदन डाले हैं। वे अंतिम तिथि नौ जनवरी की जगह 11 जनवरी को पहुंचे हैं। अभ्यर्थी सुधीर बाबू, भंवर सिंह, सपना, नेहा, कल्पना, आलोक, रामचंद्र और नीरज ने बताया कि उन्होंने आगरा हब सेंटर से जाकर पांच और छह जनवरी केा टीईटी के आवेदन पत्रों को लिए मैनपुरी, अलीगढ़, पंचशील नगर, प्रबुद्ध नगर, मुजफ्फरनगर, गाजियाबाद सहित कई अन्य जगहों की जिला शिक्षा एवं प्रशिक्षण संस्थानों को स्पीड पोस्ट किया है। जिन्हें आसानी से दो दिनों के अंदर पहुंच जाना चाहिए था। लेकिन जाने कैसे उनके अब करीब एक सप्ताह बाद फार्म वापस रहे हैं। इससे वे निराश हैं और डाक विभाग के खिलाफ कोर्ट में जाने की तैयारी कर रहे हैं। 
 Amar Ujala (16.01.2012)